Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Machine Learning
Performance Guarantees for Quantum Neural Estimation of Entropies
arXiv
Authors: Sreejith Sreekumar, Ziv Goldfeld, Mark M. Wilde
Year
2025
Paper ID
16728
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
200
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Estimating quantum entropies and divergences is an important problem in quantum physics, information theory, and machine learning. Quantum neural estimators (QNEs), which utilize a hybrid classical-quantum architecture, have recently emerged as an appealing computational framework for estimating these measures. Such estimators combine classical neural networks with parametrized quantum circuits, and their deployment typically entails tedious tuning of hyperparameters controlling the sample size, network architecture, and circuit topology. This work initiates the study of formal guarantees for QNEs of measured (Rényi) relative entropies in the form of non-asymptotic error risk bounds. We further establish exponential tail bounds showing that the error is sub-Gaussian, and thus sharply concentrates about the ground truth value. For an appropriate sub-class of density operator pairs on a space of dimension d with bounded Thompson metric, our theory establishes a copy complexity of O\(|Θ(mathcal{U}\)|d/ε2) for QNE with a quantum circuit parameter set Θ\(mathcal{U}\), which has minimax optimal dependence on the accuracy ε. Additionally, if the density operator pairs are permutation invariant, we improve the dimension dependence above to O\(|Θ(mathcal{U}\)|polylog(d)/ε2). Our theory aims to facilitate principled implementation of QNEs for measured relative entropies and guide hyperparameter tuning in practice.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Machine Learning research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2025 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Estimating quantum entropies and divergences is an important problem in quantum physics, information theory, and machine learning.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.