Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Quantum Foundations
Extensive search of Shannon entropy-based randomness certification protocols
arXiv
Authors: Robert Okuła, Piotr Mironowicz
Year
2025
Paper ID
16525
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
140
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Quantum technologies offer significant advancements in information processing and communication, notably in the domain of random number generation (RNG). The use of Bell inequalities enables users to certify the randomness of outputs produced by untrusted quantum RNG devices. We present a method for quantitatively analyzing Bell expressions used to certify randomness in quantum systems. Using this method, we conducted a comprehensive analysis on more than half a million Bell expressions involving configurations with four measurement settings for one party and three for the other. We identified five notable examples based on entropy scores under varying levels of white noise. As an extension of these results, we further incorporate the concept of self-testing for boxes (Banacki et al 2022, New J. Phys. 24 083003), enabling a more comprehensive characterization of quantum correlations through the evaluation of Boxes(α, B) and the corresponding measure Flex(α, B).
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Foundations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2025 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Quantum technologies offer significant advancements in information processing and communication, notably in the domain of random number generation (RNG).
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.