Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
Practical and Efficient Verification of Entanglement with Incomplete Measurement Settings
arXiv
Authors: Jiheon Seong, Jin-Woo Kim, Seungchan Seo, Seung-Hyun Nam, Anindita Bera, Dariusz Chruściński, June-Koo Kevin Rhee, Heonoh Kim, Joonwoo Bae
Year
2025
Paper ID
15888
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
131
Citations
N/A
Abstract
In this work, we present a practical and efficient framework for verifying entangled states when only a tomographically incomplete measurement setting is available-specifically, when access to observables is severely limited. We show how the experimental estimation of a small number of observables can be directly exploited to construct a large family of entanglement witnesses, enabling the efficient identification of entangled states. Moreover, we introduce an optimization approach, formulated as a semidefinite program, that systematically searches for those witnesses best suited to reveal entanglement under the given measurement constraints. We demonstrate the practicality of the approach in a proof-of-principle experiment with photon-polarization qubits, where entanglement is certified using only a fraction of the full measurement data. These results reveal the maximal usefulness of incomplete measurement settings for entanglement verification in realistic scenarios.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2025 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- In this work, we present a practical and efficient framework for verifying entangled states when only a tomographically incomplete measurement setting is...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.