You're viewing papers too quickly. Please wait a moment.<br>This helps keep the archive available for everyone.
Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
Why measurements are made of effects
arXiv
Authors: Tobias Fritz
Year
2026
Paper ID
15755
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
139
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Both in quantum theory and in general probabilistic theories, measurements with n outcomes are modelled as n-tuples of effects summing up to the unit effect. Why is this the case, and can this assumption be meaningfully relaxed? Here we develop generalized measurement theories (GMTs) as a mathematical framework for physical theories that is complementary to general probabilistic theories, and where this kind of question can be made precise and answered. We then give a definition of probabilistic state on a GMT, prove that measurements are made of effects in every GMT in which the probabilistic states separate the measurements, and also argue that this separation condition is physically well-motivated. Finally, we also discuss when a GMT should be considered classical and characterize GMTs corresponding to Boolean algebras as those that are strongly classical and projective.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Both in quantum theory and in general probabilistic theories, measurements with n outcomes are modelled as n-tuples of effects summing up to the unit effect.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.