Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Chemistry
The quantum superluminality in the tunnel-ionization process of H-like atoms
arXiv
Authors: Ossama Kullie, Igor A. Ivanov
Year
2026
Paper ID
15734
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
117
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The quantum tunneling time remains the subject of heated debate, and one of its most curious features is faster-than-light or superluminal tunneling. Our tunnel-ionization model of the time-delay, presented in previous work, shows good agreement with the attoclock measurement in the adiabatic and nonadiabatic field calibrations, which also enables the determination of the barrier time-delay. In the present work, we show that the tunnel-ionization for H-like atoms with large nuclear charge can be superluminal (quantum superluminality), which in principle can be investigated experimentally using the attoclock scheme. We discuss the quantum superluminality in detail for the different regimes of the tunnel-ionization. Our result shows that quantum tunneling faster-than-light is indeed possible, albeit only under somewhat extreme conditions.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Chemistry research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The quantum tunneling time remains the subject of heated debate, and one of its most curious features is faster-than-light or superluminal tunneling.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.