Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Experimental Asynchronous Measurement-Device-Independent Quantum Cryptographic Conferencing
arXiv
Authors: Yifeng Du, Yang Hu, Yufeng Liu, Wenhan Yan, Jinghao Zhang, Shining Zhu, Xiao-Song Ma
Year
2026
Paper ID
15715
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
160
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The quantum cryptographic conferencing (QCC) protocol, which distributes identical secure keys to user groups, is a crucial component of the quantum network. Previous experimental works have implemented the measurement-device-independent (MDI) QCC, of which the key rate in an N-user network scales down as Rsim O\(ηN\), respectively. Building on the MDI QCC protocol, the asynchronous MDI (AMDI) QCC protocol theoretically integrates the mode pairing scheme into QCC, significantly boosting the key rate to Rsim O(η), which is independent of the number of users, and thus demonstrating greater application potential. Experimentally, in this work, we implement the three-user AMDI QCC network without global phase tracking by adopting the fast Fourier transform-based frequency difference estimation and the phase drift compensation technique. Finally, we achieve a key rate of about 4.470times10-9 bits per pulse under a maximum overall loss of about 59.6 dB. This work provides a scalable solution for the development of large-scale quantum communication networks in the future.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The quantum cryptographic conferencing (QCC) protocol, which distributes identical secure keys to user groups, is a crucial component of the quantum network.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.