Quick Navigation
Topics
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Restriction-Based Certificate of Bipartite Schmidt Rank in Hypergraph States
arXiv
Authors: C. Fajardo, M. Paraschiv
Year
2026
Paper ID
15708
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
183
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We investigate bipartite entanglement in qubit hypergraph states across an arbitrary fixed bipartition. Using the real equally weighted (REW) representation, the Schmidt rank across the cut can be computed as the real rank of a phase-cleaned cross-cut sign matrix. Whereas graph states admit an exact cut-rank rule, because the cross-cut phase is purely bilinear, hypergraph states typically contain higher-degree cross-cut interactions, for which the cut-rank rule fails. Our approach certifies entanglement by fixing a single computational-basis assignment on a subset of qubits, thereby selecting a submatrix on an active slice. When this restriction removes all higher-degree cross-cut residues, the remaining cross-cut phase becomes bilinear up to cut-local terms. We call the resulting submatrices residual-free bilinear cores and show that they yield an exponential Schmidt-rank lower bound in terms of the mathbb{F}2-rank of an exposed core matrix. We further give a combinatorial sufficient condition, phrased as a disjoint bridge matching, that guarantees the existence of large full-rank cores for broad families of CCZ-type bridge patterns, and we present a search-and-verify procedure that constructs and certifies such cores directly from the hyperedge description.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Entanglement Theory & Quantum Correlations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We investigate bipartite entanglement in qubit hypergraph states across an arbitrary fixed bipartition.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.