Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Quantum Approximate Optimization for Decoding of Low-Density Parity-Check Codes
arXiv
Authors: Krishnakanta Barik, Goutam Paul
Year
2026
Paper ID
15702
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
155
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Decoding Low-Density Parity-Check (LDPC) codes is a fundamental problem in coding theory, and Belief Propagation (BP) is one of the most popular methods for LDPC code decoding. However, BP may encounter convergence issues and suboptimal performance, especially for short-length codes and in high-noise channels. The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) is a type of Variational Quantum Algorithm (VQA) designed to solve combinatorial optimization problems by minimizing a problem-specific cost function. In this paper, we present a QAOA-based decoding framework for LDPC codes by formulating a decoding cost function that incorporates both parity-check constraints and soft channel reliability information. The resulting optimization problem is solved using QAOA to search for low-energy configurations corresponding to valid codewords. We test the proposed method through extensive numerical experiments and compare its performance with BP decoding. The experimental results demonstrate that the QAOA-based decoder achieves a higher probability of correctly recovering the transmitted codeword than BP across multiple experimental settings.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Decoding Low-Density Parity-Check (LDPC) codes is a fundamental problem in coding theory, and Belief Propagation (BP) is one of the most popular methods for LDPC code decoding.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.