Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Quantum Machine Learning
The Inverse Born Rule Fallacy: On the Informational Limits of Phase-Locked Amplitude Encoding
arXiv
Authors: Sebastian Zając, Jacob L. Cybulski, Bartosz Dziewit, Tomasz Kulpa
Year
2026
Paper ID
15690
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
138
Citations
N/A
Abstract
In Quantum Machine Learning (QML) and Quantum Finance, amplitude encoding is often motivated by its logarithmic storage capacity arXiv:1307.0411. This paradigm typically relies on the mapping ψ= sqrt{P}, treating the quantum state as a derivative of a classical probability distribution P. By restricting the data manifold to the positive real orthant mathcal{S}^+, the accessible Hilbert space is effectively abelianized, rendering the representation "phase-deaf". We rigorously establish that while P is a projection of |ψ|2, the simple square-root mapping fails to recover the non-commutative structure necessary for genuine quantum advantage in classification tasks. Furthermore, we clarify why applying basis changes (like Hadamard gates) to these states fails to replicate the computational power of active phase-kickback mechanisms. Finally, we advocate for Dynamical Hamiltonian Encoding (based on QIFT), where data generates non-commutative evolution rather than serving as a static, phase-locked vector.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Machine Learning research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- In Quantum Machine Learning (QML) and Quantum Finance, amplitude encoding is often motivated by its logarithmic storage capacity arXiv:1307.0411.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.