Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Analogue many-body gravitating quantum systems with a network of dipolar Bose-Einstein condensates
arXiv
Authors: Youssef Trifa, Dario Cafasso, Marco Fattori, Luca Pezzè
Year
2026
Paper ID
15580
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
141
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Operational probes of the interface between quantum mechanics and general relativity in the Newtonian regime - via mass-energy equivalence in clocks or spatial superpositions in interferometers - share a common description in terms of an effective qubit-qubit Ising coupling. Here we generalize both paradigms to interacting (N+1)-level effective qudits made of atomic ensembles with particle number, N. The many-body enhancement boosts the signal-to-noise and increases the effective interaction rate, facilitating the observation of gravitationally induced entanglement and decoherence, certified by metrological witnesses based on local and collective measurements. Furthermore, we show that quantum effects induced by gravitational interaction can be simulated by trapped bimodal Bose-Einstein condensates with long-range (e.g. dipolar) coupling, providing a programmable analogue platform to explore gravitating quantum dynamics at accessible time and energy scales. Finally, extending the protocol to a sensor network broadens the entanglement-detection window.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Operational probes of the interface between quantum mechanics and general relativity in the Newtonian regime - via mass-energy equivalence in clocks or spatial superpositions...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.