Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Optimization
Exploiting Low-Rank Structure in Max-K-Cut Problems
arXiv
Authors: Ria Stevens, Fangshuo Liao, Barbara Su, Jianqiang Li, Anastasios Kyrillidis
Year
2026
Paper ID
15539
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
164
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We approach the Max-3-Cut problem through the lens of maximizing complex-valued quadratic forms and demonstrate that low-rank structure in the objective matrix can be exploited, leading to alternative algorithms to classical semidefinite programming (SDP) relaxations and heuristic techniques. We propose an algorithm for maximizing these quadratic forms over a domain of size K that enumerates and evaluates a set of Oleft\(n2r-1right\) candidate solutions, where n is the dimension of the matrix and r represents the rank of an approximation of the objective. We prove that this candidate set is guaranteed to include the exact maximizer when K=3 (corresponding to Max-3-Cut) and the objective is low-rank, and provide approximation guarantees when the objective is a perturbation of a low-rank matrix. This construction results in a family of novel, inherently parallelizable and theoretically-motivated algorithms for Max-3-Cut. Extensive experimental results demonstrate that our approach achieves performance comparable to existing algorithms across a wide range of graphs, while being highly scalable.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Optimization research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We approach the Max-3-Cut problem through the lens of maximizing complex-valued quadratic forms and demonstrate that low-rank structure in the objective matrix can be...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.