Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Optimization
Mapping NP-Hard Problems to Restricted Adiabatic Quantum Architectures
arXiv
Authors: Gary J. Mooney, Sam U. Y. Tonetto, Charles D. Hill, Lloyd C. L. Hollenberg
Year
2019
Paper ID
15112
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
137
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We introduce a framework for mapping NP-Hard problems to adiabatic quantum computing (AQC) architectures that are heavily restricted in both connectivity and dynamic range of couplings, for which minor-embedding - the standard problem mapping method - cannot be directly applied. Separating the mapping into two distinct stages, we introduce problem-specific reductions for both quadratic unconstrained binary optimisation (QUBO) and satisfiability (SAT) and develop the subdivision-embedding method that is suitable for directly embedding onto these heavily restricted architectures. The theory underpinning this framework provides tools to aid in the manipulation of Ising Hamiltonians for the purposes of Ising energy minimisation, and could be used to assist in developing and optimising further problem mapping techniques. For each of the problem mapping methods presented, we examine how the physical qubit count scales with problem size on architectures of varying connectivity.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Optimization research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2019 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We introduce a framework for mapping NP-Hard problems to adiabatic quantum computing (AQC) architectures that are heavily restricted in both connectivity and dynamic range of...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.