Quick Navigation

Topics

Trapped Ion Quantum Computing Superconducting Qubits

Estimating the precision for quantum process tomography

arXiv
Authors: E. O. Kiktenko, D. N. Kublikova, A. K. Fedorov

Year

2019

Paper ID

15110

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

86

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Quantum tomography is a widely applicable tool for complete characterization of quantum states and processes. In the present work, we develop a method for precision-guaranteed quantum process tomography. With the use of the Choi-Jamiolkowski isomorphism, we generalize the recently suggested extended norm minimization estimator for the case of quantum processes. Our estimator is based on the Hilbert-Schmidt distance for quantum processes. Specifically, we discuss the application of our method for characterizing quantum gates of a superconducting quantum processor in the framework of the IBM Q Experience.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Superconducting Qubits research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2019 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Quantum tomography is a widely applicable tool for complete characterization of quantum states and processes.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #15110 #69595 Tantalum as a base material for... #69534 Readout-Induced Leakage in Supe... #69599 Tensor network compression usin... #69590 Quantum Simulation of Spin-Depe...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.