Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Optimization
Quantum Machine Learning
Portfolio rebalancing experiments using the Quantum Alternating Operator Ansatz
arXiv
Authors: Mark Hodson, Brendan Ruck, Hugh Ong, David Garvin, Stefan Dulman
Year
2019
Paper ID
14845
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
119
Citations
N/A
Abstract
This paper investigates the experimental performance of a discrete portfolio optimization problem relevant to the financial services industry on the gate-model of quantum computing. We implement and evaluate a portfolio rebalancing use case on an idealized simulator of a gate-model quantum computer. The characteristics of this exemplar application include trading in discrete lots, non-linear trading costs, and the investment constraint. We design a novel problem encoding and hard constraint mixers for the Quantum Alternating Operator Ansatz, and compare to its predecessor the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm. Experimental analysis demonstrates the potential tractability of this application on Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) hardware, identifying portfolios within 5% of the optimal adjusted returns and with the optimal risk for a small eight-stock portfolio.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Machine Learning research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2019 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- This paper investigates the experimental performance of a discrete portfolio optimization problem relevant to the financial services industry on the gate-model of quantum...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.