Quick Navigation

Topics

Open Quantum Systems Decoherence Quantum Chemistry

Enantiomeric excess determination based on nonreciprocal transition induced spectral line elimination

arXiv
Authors: Xun-Wei Xu, Chong Ye, Yong Li, Ai-Xi Chen

Year

2019

Paper ID

14671

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

86

Citations

N/A

Abstract

The spontaneous emission spectrum of a multi-level atom or molecule with nonreciprocal transition is investigated. It is shown that the nonreciprocal transition can lead to the elimination of a spectral line in the spontaneous emission spectrum. As an application, we show that nonreciprocal transition arises from the phase-related driving fields in chiral molecules with cyclic three-level transitions, and the elimination of a spectral line induced by nonreciprocal transition provides us a method to determine the enantiomeric excess for the chiral molecules without requiring the enantio-pure samples.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Chemistry research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2019 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • The spontaneous emission spectrum of a multi-level atom or molecule with nonreciprocal transition is investigated.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #14671 #68437 Transition-state lattice modes ... #68465 Bounding Eigenstate Overlap fro... #68456 Analytic Properties of the Jost... #68455 Mediative Fuzzy Logic: From Typ...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.