Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Chemistry
Experimentally demonstration of the repulsive Casimir force in the gold-cyclohexane-PTFE system
arXiv
Authors: Qian Hu, Jianhua Sun, Qian Zhao, Yonggang Meng
Year
2019
Paper ID
14620
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
108
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The experimentally demonstration of Casimir force transition from attraction to repulsion is still challenging. Herein, the Casimir forces for a sphere above a plate immersed in different liquids were precisely measured using Atomic force microscope, and the long-range repulsive Casimir force in the gold-cyclohexane-PTFE system is observed for the first time. The experimental data are consistent with the calculation by Lifshitz theory, which offers the direct evidence for the system of ε1<ε3<ε2. It further verifies the reasonability of van Zwol et al. dielectric model to describe the intervening fluids. This study is promising for potential applications on quantum levitation and frictionless devices in MEMS and NEMS by Casimir repulsion.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Chemistry research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2019 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The experimentally demonstration of Casimir force transition from attraction to repulsion is still challenging.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.