Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Chemistry
Light from an ion crystal: bunching or antibunching?
arXiv
Authors: Sebastian Wolf, Stefan Richter, Joachim von Zanthier, Ferdinand Schmidt-Kaler
Year
2019
Paper ID
14567
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
157
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Photon statistics divides light sources into three different categories, characterized by bunched, antibunched or uncorrelated photon arrival times. Single atoms, ions, molecules, or solid state emitters display antibunching of photons, while classical thermal sources exhibit photon bunching. Here we demonstrate a light source in free space, where the photon statistics depends on the direction of observation, undergoing a continuous crossover between photon bunching and antibunching. We employ two trapped ions, observe their fluorescence under continuous laser light excitation, and record the spatially resolved autocorrelation function g(2)(τ) with a movable Hanbury Brown and Twiss detector. Varying the detector position we find a minimum value for antibunching, g(2)(0) = 0.60(5) and a maximum of g(2)(0)=1.46(8) for bunching, demonstrating that this source radiates fundamentally different types of light alike. The observed variation of the autocorrelation function is understood in the Dicke model of heralded entangled states and the observed maximum and minimum values are modeled, taking independently measured experimental parameters into account.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Chemistry research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2019 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Photon statistics divides light sources into three different categories, characterized by bunched, antibunched or uncorrelated photon arrival times.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.