Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
Modular zero modes and sewing the states of QFT
arXiv
Authors: Nima Lashkari
Year
2019
Paper ID
14554
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
148
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We point out an important difference between continuum relativistic quantum field theory (QFT) and lattice models with dramatic consequences for the theory of multi-partite entanglement. On a lattice given a collection of density matrices ρ(1),ρ(2), cdots, ρ(n) there is no guarantee that there exists an n-partite pure state |Ωrangle12cdots n that reduces to these marginals. The state |Ωrangle12cdots n exists only if the eigenvalues of the density matrices ρ(i) satisfy certain polygon inequalities. We show that in QFT, as opposed to lattice systems, splitting the space into n non-overlapping regions any collection of local states ω(1),ω(2),cdots ω(n) come from the restriction of a global pure state. The reason is that rotating any local state ω(i) by unitary Ui localized in the ith region we come arbitrarily close to any other local state ψ(i). We construct explicit examples of such local unitaries using the cocycle.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2019 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We point out an important difference between continuum relativistic quantum field theory (QFT) and lattice models with dramatic consequences for the theory of multi-partite...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.