You're viewing papers too quickly. Please wait a moment.<br>This helps keep the archive available for everyone.
Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
Classical vs. quantum satisfiability in linear constraint systems modulo an integer
arXiv
Authors: Hammam Qassim, Joel. J. Wallman
Year
2019
Paper ID
14551
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
165
Citations
N/A
Abstract
A system of linear constraints can be unsatisfiable and yet admit a solution in the form of quantum observables whose correlated outcomes satisfy the constraints. Recently, it has been claimed that such a satisfiability gap can be demonstrated using tensor products of generalized Pauli observables in odd dimensions. We provide an explicit proof that no quantum-classical satisfiability gap in any linear constraint system can be achieved using these observables. We prove a few other results for linear constraint systems modulo d > 2. We show that a characterization of the existence of quantum solutions when d is prime, due to Cleve et al, holds with a small modification for arbitrary d. We identify a key property of some linear constraint systems, called phase-commutation, and give a no-go theorem for the existence of quantum solutions to constraint systems for odd d whenever phase-commutation is present. As a consequence, all natural generalizations of the Peres-Mermin magic square and pentagram to odd prime d do not exhibit a satisfiability gap.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2019 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- A system of linear constraints can be unsatisfiable and yet admit a solution in the form of quantum observables whose correlated outcomes satisfy the constraints.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.