You're viewing papers too quickly. Please wait a moment.<br>This helps keep the archive available for everyone.

Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Algorithms

Quantum Weakest Preconditions for Reasoning about Expected Runtimes of Quantum Programs (Extended Version)

arXiv
Authors: Junyi Liu, Li Zhou, Gilles Barthe, Mingsheng Ying

Year

2019

Paper ID

14473

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

116

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We study expected runtimes for quantum programs. Inspired by recent work on probabilistic programs, we first define expected runtime as a generalisation of quantum weakest precondition. Then, we show that the expected runtime of a quantum program can be represented as the expectation of an observable (in physics). A method for computing the expected runtimes of quantum programs in finite-dimensional state spaces is developed. Several examples are provided as applications of this method, including computing the expected runtime of quantum Bernoulli Factory - a quantum algorithm for generating random numbers. In particular, using our new method, an open problem of computing the expected runtime of quantum random walks introduced by Ambainis et al. (STOC 2001) is solved.

Why This Paper Matters

  • It adds a 2019 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We study expected runtimes for quantum programs.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #14473 #69983 Spectral Leakage and Masking Ef... #69982 Dimensionality Reduction of QAO... #69981 A Hybrid Quantum-Classical Appr... #69980 Complexity Inequalities for Qua...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.