Quick Navigation

Topics

Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations Superconducting Qubits

Evidence of the entanglement constraint on wave-particle duality using the IBM Q quantum computer

arXiv
Authors: Nicolas Schwaller, Marc-André Dupertuis, Clément Javerzac-Galy

Year

2019

Paper ID

14300

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

77

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We experimentally verify the link existing between entanglement and the amount of wave-particle duality in a bipartite quantum system, with superconducting qubits in the IBM Q quantum computer. We consider both pure and mixed states, and study the influence of state purity on the observation of the complementarity "triality" relation of Jakob and Bergou. This work confirms the quantitative completion of local Bohr's complementarity principle by the nonlocal quantum entanglement typical of a truly bipartite quantum system.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Superconducting Qubits research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2019 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We experimentally verify the link existing between entanglement and the amount of wave-particle duality in a bipartite quantum system, with superconducting qubits in the IBM Q...

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #14300 #69598 The classical boundaries of the... #69597 Tripartite Entanglement in $e^+... #69595 Tantalum as a base material for... #69593 Local correlations in long-rang...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.