Quick Navigation

Topics

Open Quantum Systems Decoherence

Metric symmetry by design in general relativity

Crossref
Authors: Viktor T Toth

Year

2024

Paper ID

13918

Status

Peer-reviewed

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

124

Citations

0

Abstract

Abstract The usual derivation of Einstein’s field equations from the Einstein–Hilbert action is performed by silently assuming the metric tensor’s symmetric character. If this symmetry is not assumed, the result is a new theory, such as Einstein’s attempted Unified Field Theory or Moffat’s Nonsymmetric Gravitational Theory. Explicitly enforcing the constraint by means of a Lagrange-multiplier term restores Einstein’s field equations, but the multiplier appears as an additional, unconstrained antisymmetric term. We briefly discuss the possible significance of this term with respect to a nonvanishing cosmological angular momentum, a sourced spin current, the nonsymmetric nature of the Einstein pseudotensor characterizing the energy–momentum of the gravitational field, and possible implications on attempts to obtain a quantum theory of gravity.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Open Quantum Systems & Decoherence research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Abstract The usual derivation of Einstein’s field equations from the Einstein–Hilbert action is performed by silently assuming the metric tensor’s symmetric character.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #13918

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal • updated 2026-11-03 07:47:31

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.