Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Machine Learning

Effectiveness of Hybrid Quantum-Classical and Quanvolutional Neural Networks for image classification

Crossref
Authors: Yevhenii Trochun, Yuri Gordienko

Year

2024

Paper ID

13863

Status

Peer-reviewed

Abstract Read

~3 min

Abstract Words

396

Citations

3

Abstract

The article focuses on studying the effectiveness of two different Hybrid Neural Networks (HNNs) architectures for solving real-world image classification problems. The first approach investigated in the research is a hybridization technique that allows creation of HNN based on a classical neural network by replacing a number of hidden layers of the neural network with a variational quantum circuit, which allows to reduce the complexity of the classical part of the neural network and move part of computations to a quantum device. The second approach is a hybridization technique based on utilizing quanvolutional operations for image processing as the first quantum convolutional layer of the hybrid neural network, thus building a Quanvolutional Neural Network (QNN). QNN leverages quantum phenomena to facilitate feature extraction, enabling the model to achieve higher accuracy metrics than its classical counterpart. The effectiveness of both architectures was tested on several image classification problems. The first one is a classical image classification problem of CIFAR10 images classification, widely used as a benchmark for various imagery-related tasks. Another problem used for the effectiveness study is the problem of geospatial data analysis. The second problem represents a real-world use case where quantum computing utilization can be very fruitful in the future. For studying the effectiveness, several models were assembled: HNN with a quantum device that replaces one of the hidden layers of the neural network, QNN based on quanvolutional operation and utilizes VGG-16 architecture as a classical part of the model, and also an unmodified VGG-16 was used as a reference model. Experiments were conducted to measure the models' key efficiency metrics: maximal accuracy, complexity of a quantum part of the model and complexity of a classical part of the model. The results of the research indicated the feasibility of both approaches for solving both proposed image classification problems. Results were analyzed to outline the advantages and disadvantages of every approach in terms of selected key metrics. Experiments showed that QNN architectures proved to be a feasible and effective solution for critical practical tasks requiring higher levels of model prediction accuracy and, simultaneously, can tolerate higher processing time and significantly increased costs due to a high number of quantum operations required. Also, the results of the experiments indicated that HNN architectures proved to be a feasible solution for time-critical practical tasks that require higher processing speed and can tolerate slightly decreased accuracy of model predictions.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Machine Learning research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • The article focuses on studying the effectiveness of two different Hybrid Neural Networks (HNNs) architectures for solving real-world image classification problems.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #13863 #78828 Verifiable Sampling for Delegat... #78813 Large-Scale Benchmarking of Qua... #78775 On linearity or non-linearity i...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal • updated 2026-10-25 02:57:56

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.