Quick Navigation

Topics

Trapped Ion Quantum Computing

Qade: solving differential equations on quantum annealers

Crossref
Authors: Juan Carlos Criado, Michael Spannowsky

Year

2022

Paper ID

13624

Status

Peer-reviewed

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

130

Citations

23

Abstract

Abstract We present a general method, called Qade, for solving differential equations using a quantum annealer. One of the main advantages of this method is its flexibility and reliability. On current devices, Qade can solve systems of coupled partial differential equations that depend linearly on the solution and its derivatives, with non-linear variable coefficients and arbitrary inhomogeneous terms. We test this through several examples that we implement in state-of-the-art quantum annealers. The examples include a partial differential equation and a system of coupled equations. This is the first time that equations of these types have been solved in such devices. We find that the solution can be obtained accurately for problems requiring a small enough function basis. We provide a Python package implementing the method at gitlab.com/jccriado/qade.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2022 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Abstract We present a general method, called Qade, for solving differential equations using a quantum annealer.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #13624

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal • updated 2026-11-05 02:29:37

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.