!
You're viewing papers too quickly. Please wait a moment.<br>This helps keep the archive available for everyone.

Quick Navigation

Topics

Spin Qubits Silicon Quantum Computing Photonic Quantum Computing Quantum Chemistry

Photoacoustic determination of the luminescent quantum efficiency of yb(3+) ions in lithium niobate.

PubMed
Authors: Muñoz JA, Tocho JO, Cussó F

Year

1998

Paper ID

13519

Status

Peer-reviewed

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

60

Citations

14

Abstract

The luminescent quantum efficiency of Yb(3+) ions in lithium niobate (LiNbO(3)) is obtained by use of a method based on the simultaneous and multiwavelength measurement of photoacoustic and luminescent signals after modulated continuous laser excitation. The experimental results give a high value for the luminescence quantum efficiency ? = 0.90 ? 0.05, coincident with the predictions by the comparison between experimental and estimated radiative lifetimes.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Chemistry research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 1998 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • The luminescent quantum efficiency of Yb(3+) ions in lithium niobate (LiNbO(3)) is obtained by use of a method based on the simultaneous and multiwavelength measurement of...

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #13519 #78837 TLS loss in superconducting res... #78797 Local polarization control of o... #78792 Demonstration of subspace-searc...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal • updated 2026-10-21 18:14:36

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.