Quick Navigation
Topics
Open Quantum Systems Decoherence
Quantum Simulation
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Quantum Chemistry
Analysis of the anisotropic dimension in the RIACT (II) multiple quantum MAS NMR experiment for I = 3/2 nuclei.
PubMed
Authors: Lim KH, Grey CP
Year
1998
Paper ID
13494
Status
Peer-reviewed
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
196
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Numerical simulations of the anisotropic dimension of the Rotation-Induced Adiabatic Coherence Transfer (RIACT) MQ experiment have been performed as a function of the asymmetry parameter, eta, for different spacings between the triple quantum (3Q) excitation and 3Q to single quantum (1Q) reconversion pulses. Large distortions of the spectra are observed, in comparison to the spectra obtained with 1D MAS NMR methods. The method is very sensitive to the relative orientation of the quadrupolar tensor and rotor axis, and signal can only be obtained from a maximum of 60% of the powder. The intensity varies with the spacing between the two pulses, t1, reaching a minimum of 30% when t1 is either a multiple of a full rotor period (n tau(r)) or for (n + 1/2) rotor periods, for pulse lengths (tau1SL) of a quarter of a rotor period. The maximum of 60% is obtained when t1 = n tau(r) - tau1SL. Experimental spectra were acquired for anhydrous Na2HPO4. Good fits were obtained between the experimental and simulated spectra, even for the non-rotor synchronized experiment, by choosing fixed values of t1. The simulations allowed the quadrupole coupling constants and asymmetry parameters to be extracted from the experimental data.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 1998 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Numerical simulations of the anisotropic dimension of the Rotation-Induced Adiabatic Coherence Transfer (RIACT) MQ experiment have been performed as a function of the asymmetry...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.