Quick Navigation

Overview Topics Abstract Importance Paper Tools References Reactions Discussion Publication

Topics

Trapped Ion Quantum Computing

Quantum logic gates and nuclear magnetic resonance pulse sequences.

PubMed
Authors: Jones JA, Hansen RH, Mosca M

Year

1998

Paper ID

13449

Status

Peer-reviewed

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

81

Citations

86

Abstract

There has recently been considerable interest in the use of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) as a technology for the implementation of small quantum computers. These computers operate by the laws of quantum mechanics, rather than classical mechanics and can be used to implement new quantum algorithms. Here we describe how NMR in principle can be used to implement all the elements required to build quantum computers, and draw comparisons between the pulse sequences involved and those of more conventional NMR experiments.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 1998 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • There has recently been considerable interest in the use of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) as a technology for the implementation of small quantum computers.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Become a member Sign in
Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

[1] DOI https://doi.org/10.1006/jmre.1998.1606 [2] Publisher https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9878463/

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #13449

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal • updated 2026-11-02 12:57:51

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.