Quick Navigation

Topics

Open Quantum Systems Decoherence Quantum Chemistry

Facet diagrams for quantum similarity data.

PubMed
Authors: Robert D, Gironés X, Carbó-Dorca R

Year

1999

Paper ID

13422

Status

Peer-reviewed

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

94

Citations

22

Abstract

The objective of this work is to demonstrate that an appropriate treatment of quantum similarity matrices can reveal hidden data grouping related to relevant structural features and even to biological properties of interest. Classical scaling is used here to extract the information contained in the similarity relationships between the elements of a molecular set. Facet theory is invoked to relate, in a qualitative way, the spatial regions to structural characteristics as well as to properties of interest. Two application examples are discussed: the Cramer steroid set and a benzene, toluene and xylene derivatives set.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Chemistry research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 1999 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • The objective of this work is to demonstrate that an appropriate treatment of quantum similarity matrices can reveal hidden data grouping related to relevant structural...

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #13422 #78837 TLS loss in superconducting res... #78797 Local polarization control of o... #78792 Demonstration of subspace-searc...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal • updated 2026-10-21 18:08:05

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.