Quick Navigation
Topics
Spin Qubits Silicon Quantum Computing
Quantum State Preparation Representation
Quantum Machine Learning
Quantum Chemistry
Detection of subtle lung nodules: relative influence of quantum and anatomic noise on chest radiographs.
PubMed
Authors: Samei E, Flynn MJ, Eyler WR
Year
1999
Paper ID
13383
Status
Peer-reviewed
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
181
Citations
N/A
Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess the relative influence of quantum mottle and structured lung patterns (anatomic noise) on the detection of subtle lung nodules on chest radiographs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty 8 x 8-cm lung pattern images were extracted from digital chest radiographs in healthy individuals. Sixty quantum mottle images of the same size and quantum noise level were extracted from uniformly exposed digital radiographs. Simulated nodules with various peak contrast-diameter products (CD) that emulated subtle tissue-equivalent lung nodules were numerically superimposed at the center on three-fourths of the images. Printouts were independently viewed and scored by five experienced radiologists. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (Az) was estimated as a measure of the detectability of the nodules. RESULTS: At a fixed observer performance level e.g., Az = 0.8, much smaller and lower-contrast nodules were detected on quantum mottle images 1-mm diameter, CD = 0.01 mm, compared with those on anatomic images 4.5-mm diameter, CD = 0.20 mm. The findings generally agreed with the signal-to-noise ratio calculations based on statistical observer models. CONCLUSION: The detection of subtle lung nodules on chest radiographs is limited by anatomic noise.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Machine Learning research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 1999 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- PURPOSE: To assess the relative influence of quantum mottle and structured lung patterns (anatomic noise) on the detection of subtle lung nodules on chest radiographs.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.