Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Chemistry

Resonant mechanisms of inelastic light scattering by low-dimensional electron gases.

PubMed
Authors: Jusserand B, Vijayaraghavan MN, Laruelle F, Cavanna A, Etienne B

Year

2000

Paper ID

13272

Status

Peer-reviewed

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

84

Citations

21

Abstract

The contribution of elementary excitations in low-dimensional electron gases to resonant inelastic light scattering is found to be determined by interband transitions involving states at specific wave vectors. In modulation-doped GaAs/GaAlAs quantum wells, we detect only the single-particle excitations (SPE) at resonances with electron-hole transitions at the Fermi wave vector, and only plasmons at resonances with zone-center excitons. The plasmon cross section is comparable to the SPE when double electronic resonance is achieved by tuning the plasmon energy to a valence subband separation.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Chemistry research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2000 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • The contribution of elementary excitations in low-dimensional electron gases to resonant inelastic light scattering is found to be determined by interband transitions involving...

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #13272 #78837 TLS loss in superconducting res... #78797 Local polarization control of o... #78792 Demonstration of subspace-searc...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal • updated 2026-10-20 19:22:17

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.