Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Chemistry

Ionization of xenon Rydberg atoms at a metal surface.

PubMed
Authors: Hill SB, Haich CB, Zhou Z, Nordlander P, Dunning FB

Year

2000

Paper ID

13269

Status

Peer-reviewed

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

97

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Experiments in which a thermal-energy beam of xenon Rydberg atoms is directed at near grazing incidence onto a flat Au(111) surface are described that provide new insight into charge transfer and electron tunneling during atom/surface interactions. Analysis of the data shows that for the present range of principal quantum number n, 13 < or = n < or = 20, ionization occurs at an atom/surface separation Z(i) = (4.5+/-0.9)n2a0, where n2a0 is the Bohr radius of the atom. This result is in good agreement with the value Z(i) approximately 3.8n2a0 predicted by ab initio hydrogenic theory.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Chemistry research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2000 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Experiments in which a thermal-energy beam of xenon Rydberg atoms is directed at near grazing incidence onto a flat Au(111) surface are described that provide new insight into...

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #13269 #69596 Comprehensive pKa Data Augmenta... #69589 An integrated ultrahigh vacuum ... #69558 Analyzing Initialization Strate... #69553 VQE as Initial State Preparatio...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.