Quick Navigation

Topics

Open Quantum Systems Decoherence

Restrictions on the coherence of the ultrafast optical emission from an electron-hole-pair condensate.

PubMed
Authors: Olaya-Castro A, Rodríguez FJ, Quiroga L, Tejedor C

Year

2001

Paper ID

13228

Status

Peer-reviewed

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

89

Citations

28

Abstract

We report on the transfer of coherence from a quantum-well electron-hole condensate to the light it emits. As a function of density, the coherence of the electron-hole-pair system evolves from being full for the low-density Bose-Einstein condensate to a chaotic behavior for a high-density BCS-like state. This degree of coherence is transferred to the light emitted in a damped oscillatory way in the ultrafast regime. Additionally, the photon field exhibits squeezing properties during the transfer time. Our results suggest a new type of ultrafast experiments for detecting electron-hole-pair condensation.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Open Quantum Systems & Decoherence research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2001 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We report on the transfer of coherence from a quantum-well electron-hole condensate to the light it emits.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #13228 #68456 Analytic Properties of the Jost... #68455 Mediative Fuzzy Logic: From Typ... #68453 Weak wave turbulence as a precu... #68449 Scale-Invariant Open Quantum Sy...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal • updated 2026-06-13 05:16:54

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.