Quick Navigation

Topics

Open Quantum Systems Decoherence Quantum Chemistry

Quantum interference in double ionization and fragmentation of C(6)H(6) in intense laser fields.

PubMed
Authors: Bhardwaj VR, Rayner DM, Villeneuve DM, Corkum PB

Year

2001

Paper ID

13212

Status

Peer-reviewed

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

91

Citations

108

Abstract

During tunnel ionization of atoms or molecules by strong laser fields, the electron acquires a transverse velocity which is characteristic of the ionization process. Ellipticity measurements identify nonsequential double ionization as due to recollision in C(6)H(6) and simultaneously measure the transverse velocity distribution of the electron wave packet. We observe signatures of quantum interference of different tunneling trajectories and find identical dependence of nonsequential double ionization and fragmentation of C(6)H(6) on the ellipticity of the laser polarization. This identifies electron recollision as the dominant source of fragmentation at 1.4 microm.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Chemistry research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2001 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • During tunnel ionization of atoms or molecules by strong laser fields, the electron acquires a transverse velocity which is characteristic of the ionization process.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #13212 #68437 Transition-state lattice modes ... #68465 Bounding Eigenstate Overlap fro... #68456 Analytic Properties of the Jost... #68455 Mediative Fuzzy Logic: From Typ...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal • updated 2026-06-13 04:48:01

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.