Quick Navigation

Topics

Trapped Ion Quantum Computing

High level ab initio calculations of the optical gap of small silicon quantum dots.

PubMed
Authors: Garoufalis CS, Zdetsis AD, Grimme S

Year

2001

Paper ID

13179

Status

Peer-reviewed

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

104

Citations

168

Abstract

Using state of the art time-dependent density functional theory and multireference second-order perturbation theory, we have accurately calculated (within 0.3 eV) in real space the optical gap of small silicon quantum dots, with diameters up to 25 A. Our results, which support the quantum confinement hypothesis, are in excellent agreement with recent and earlier experimental data on oxygen-free samples and the conclusions of Wilcoxon et al. [Phys. Rev. B 60, 2704 (1999)]. We have found that the diameter of the smallest dot, which could emit photoluminescence in the visible region of the spectrum, is around 22 A. Our work can resolve existing controversies and bridge diverse experimental and theoretical results.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2001 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Using state of the art time-dependent density functional theory and multireference second-order perturbation theory, we have accurately calculated (within 0.3 eV) in real space...

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #13179

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal • updated 2026-11-01 15:48:48

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.