Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Chemistry

Electrodynamics of a Coulomb glass in n-type silicon.

PubMed
Authors: Helgren E, Armitage NP, Grüner G

Year

2002

Paper ID

13123

Status

Peer-reviewed

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

102

Citations

28

Abstract

Measurements of the complex frequency dependent conductivity of uncompensated n-type silicon are reported. The experiments are done in the quantum limit, variant Planck's over 2pi omega>k(B)T, across a broad doping range on the insulating side of the metal-insulator transition. The low energy linear frequency dependence is consistent with theories of a Coulomb glass, but discrepancies exist in the relative magnitudes of the complex components. At higher energies we observe a crossover to a quadratic frequency dependence that is sharper than expected. The concentration dependence gives evidence that the Coulomb interaction energy is the energy scale that determines this crossover.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Chemistry research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2002 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Measurements of the complex frequency dependent conductivity of uncompensated n-type silicon are reported.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #13123 #69596 Comprehensive pKa Data Augmenta... #69589 An integrated ultrahigh vacuum ... #69558 Analyzing Initialization Strate... #69553 VQE as Initial State Preparatio...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal • updated 2026-06-20 08:13:50

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.