Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum State Preparation Representation
Quantum Simulation
Quantum Chemistry
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Odd carbon long linear chains HC2n+1H n = 4-11: properties of the neutrals and radical anions.
PubMed
Authors: HornĂ½ L, Petraco ND, Schaefer III HF
Year
2002
Paper ID
13113
Status
Peer-reviewed
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
156
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The optimized geometries, adiabatic electron affinities, vertical electron affinities, vertical electron detachment energies (for the anions), and IR-active vibrational frequencies have been predicted for the long linear carbon chains HC(2)(n)()(+1)H n = 4-11. The B3LYP density functional combined with DZP and TZ2P basis sets was used in this theoretical study. These methods have been extensively calibrated versus experiment for the prediction of electron affinities (Chem. Rev. 2002, 102, 231). The computed physical properties are discussed and compared with the even carbon chains HC(2)(n)()H. The predicted electron affinities form a remarkably regular sequence: 2.12 eV (HC(9)H), 2.42 eV (HC(11)H), 2.66 eV (HC(13)H), 2.85 eV (HC(15)H), 3.01 eV (HC(17)H), 3.14 eV (HC(19)H), 3.25 eV (HC(21)H), and 3.35 eV (HC(23)H). These electron affinities are as much as 0.4 eV higher than those for analogous even carbon chains. The predicted structures display an intermediate cumulene-polyacetylene type of bonding, with the inner carbons appearing cumulenic and the outer carbons polyacetylenic.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2002 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The optimized geometries, adiabatic electron affinities, vertical electron affinities, vertical electron detachment energies (for the anions), and IR-active vibrational...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.