Quick Navigation

Topics

Open Quantum Systems Decoherence Photonic Quantum Computing

Frequency stabilization of quantum-cascade lasers by use of optical cavities.

PubMed
Authors: Taubman MS, Myers TL, Cannon BD, Williams RM, Capasso F, Gmachl C, Sivco DL, Cho AY

Year

2002

Paper ID

13103

Status

Peer-reviewed

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

94

Citations

64

Abstract

We report a heterodyne beat with a linewidth of 5.6+/-0.6 Hz between two cavity-stabilized quantum-cascade lasers operating at 8.5 microm . We also present a technique for measuring this beat that avoids the need for extreme isolation of the optical cavities from the environment, that of employing a third servo loop with low bandwidth to force one cavity to track the slow drifts and low-frequency fluctuations of the other. Although it is not fully independent, this technique greatly facilitates heterodyne beat measurements for evaluating the performance of cavity-locked lasers above the bandwidth of the third loop.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Photonic Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2002 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We report a heterodyne beat with a linewidth of 5.6+/-0.6 Hz between two cavity-stabilized quantum-cascade lasers operating at 8.5 microm .

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #13103 #68456 Analytic Properties of the Jost... #68455 Mediative Fuzzy Logic: From Typ... #68453 Weak wave turbulence as a precu... #68449 Scale-Invariant Open Quantum Sy...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal • updated 2026-06-11 01:07:27

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.