Quick Navigation
Topics
Spin Qubits Silicon Quantum Computing
Quantum Chemistry
Automated analysis of large sets of heteronuclear correlation spectra in NMR-based drug discovery.
PubMed
Authors: Damberg CS, Orekhov VY, Billeter M
Year
2002
Paper ID
13086
Status
Peer-reviewed
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
170
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Drug discovery procedures based on NMR typically require the analysis of thousands of NMR spectra. For example, in "SAR by NMR", two-dimensional NMR spectra are recorded for a target protein mixed with ligand candidates from a comprehensive library of small molecules and are compared to the corresponding spectrum for the protein alone. We present an automated procedure for the comparative analysis of large sets of heteronuclear single quantum coherence spectra, which is based on three-way decomposition and implemented as the software package MUNIN. In a single step, spectra with differences in the peak positions (indicating ligand binding) and the affected peaks are identified. By omission of peak picking, ad hoc scoring of the quality of doubtful peaks is avoided. The procedure has been tested on the bacterial ribonuclease barnase, with a protein concentration of only 50 microM, using several small molecules including the substrate analogue 3'-GMP. Sets of 51 spectra were processed simultaneously, and it is concluded that spectra with binding ligands can be unambiguously identified from much larger sets of spectra.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Chemistry research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2002 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Drug discovery procedures based on NMR typically require the analysis of thousands of NMR spectra.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.