Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum State Preparation Representation
Quantum Simulation
Quantum Chemistry
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
One-N, six-membered heterocyclic carbene complexes and the remote heteroatom concept.
PubMed
Authors: Raubenheimer HG, Cronje S
Year
2008
Paper ID
12626
Status
Peer-reviewed
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
158
Citations
N/A
Abstract
A whole library of six-membered N-heterocyclic carbene complexes of Ni(ii) and Pd(ii) were prepared by oxidative substitution. In some of these compounds the heteroatom occurs in a position distant from the carbene donor atom. Combined structural and physical data, especially (13)C NMR results, indicate carbene character in such ligands. DFT quantum mechanical calculation at the RI-BP56/SVP level allowed the extraction of valuable chemical information predicting that rNHC r = remote ligands would bond more strongly than their nNHC n = normal isomers. This result is also corroborated by calculations on the metal complexes themselves. Orbital overlap (mainly sigma) follows the order N(2)HC(5) < nN(1)HC(6) < rN(1)HC(6) when ligands derived from halo-imidazolium and halo-pyridinium salts are compared. In C-C coupling catalysis using Pd(ii) and Ni(ii) complexes, the simple one-N, six-membered carbene complexes are superior to simple two-N, five-membered examples but clear differentiation between nNHC and rNHC precatalysts in the former family, is not always possible.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2008 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- A whole library of six-membered N-heterocyclic carbene complexes of Ni(ii) and Pd(ii) were prepared by oxidative substitution.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.