Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Chemistry
Prediction of blood-brain partitioning: a model based on ab initio calculated quantum chemical descriptors.
PubMed
Authors: Van Damme S, Langenaeker W, Bultinck P
Year
2008
Paper ID
12578
Status
Peer-reviewed
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
159
Citations
N/A
Abstract
A new model for the prediction of log BB, a penetration measure through the blood-brain barrier, based on a molecular set of 82 diverse molecules is developed. The majority of the descriptors are derived from quantum chemical ab initio calculations, augmented with a number of classical descriptors. The quantum chemical information enables one to compute fundamental properties of the molecules. The best set of descriptors was selected by sequential selection and multiple linear regression was used to develop the QSAR model. The predictive capability of the model was tested using internal and external test procedures and the domain of applicability was determined to identify reliable predictions. The selected set of descriptors shows a significant correlation with the experimental log BB. The proposed model could reproduce the data with an error approaching the experimental uncertainty and satisfies the available validation procedures. The obtained results indicate that the use of quantum chemical information in describing molecules improves the behavior of the model.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Chemistry research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2008 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- A new model for the prediction of log BB, a penetration measure through the blood-brain barrier, based on a molecular set of 82 diverse molecules is developed.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.