Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Chemistry

Density functional studies of closed-shell attractions of S(AuPH3)2 and HS(AuPH3)2 + and their dimers.

PubMed
Authors: Fang H, Zhang XG, Wang SG

Year

2009

Paper ID

12480

Status

Peer-reviewed

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

94

Citations

4

Abstract

With the help of quantum chemical calculations, S(AuPH3)2, [HS(AuPH3)2]+ and their dimers have been examined by using scalar-relativistic theory. In agreement with experimental data, [HS(AuPH3)2 +]2 is a C(2h) structure. However, [S(AuPH3)2]2 is predicted to favor a D(2d) structure. Experimental structure parameters of the title compounds were reproduced at the Xalpha level. The electronic structure and HOMO-LUMO gaps were investigated. When two monomers formed a dimer, the electronic structure of the dimer changed only slightly, but the chemical stability decreased. The intermolecular aurophilic interaction energy is decomposed and analyzed.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Chemistry research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2009 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • With the help of quantum chemical calculations, S(AuPH3)2, [HS(AuPH3)2]+ and their dimers have been examined by using scalar-relativistic theory.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #12480 #78837 TLS loss in superconducting res... #78797 Local polarization control of o... #78792 Demonstration of subspace-searc...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal • updated 2026-10-27 12:04:59

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.