!
You're viewing papers too quickly. Please wait a moment.<br>This helps keep the archive available for everyone.
Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Chemistry
Polarizability rescaling and atom-based Thole scaling in the CHARMM Drude polarizable force field for ethers.
PubMed
Authors: Baker CM, Mackerell AD Jr
Year
2010
Paper ID
12428
Status
Peer-reviewed
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
177
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Within the CHARMM polarizable force field based on the classical Drude oscillator, atomic polarizabilities are derived via fitting to ab initio calculated data on isolated gas phase molecules, with an empirical scaling factor applied to account for differences between the gas and condensed phases. In the development of polarizable models for the ethers, a polarizability scaling factor of 0.7 was previously applied [Vorobyov et al. J Comput Chem 3:1120-1133, 2007]. While the resulting force field models gave good agreement with a variety of experimental data, they systematically underestimated the liquid phase dielectric constants. Here, a new CHARMM polarizable model is developed for the ethers, employing a polarizability scaling factor of 0.85 and including atom-based Thole scale factors recently introduced into the CHARMM Drude polarizable force field [Harder et al. J Phys Chem B 112:3509-3521, 2008]. The new model offers a significant improvement in the reproduction of liquid phase dielectric constants, while maintaining the good agreement of the previous model with all other experimental and quantum mechanical data, highlighting the sensitivity of liquid phase properties to the choice of atomic polarizability parameters.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Chemistry research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2010 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Within the CHARMM polarizable force field based on the classical Drude oscillator, atomic polarizabilities are derived via fitting to ab initio calculated data on isolated gas...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.