Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Chemistry

Competitive diamond-like and endohedral fullerene structures of Si70.

PubMed
Authors: Zhao LZ, Su WS, Lu WC, Wang CZ, Ho KM

Year

2011

Paper ID

12333

Status

Peer-reviewed

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

108

Citations

9

Abstract

We performed first-principles calculations to study the structure and stability of Si(70) cluster. The results from the density functional theory calculation with the Becke-Lee-Yang-Parr and B3LYP exchange-correlation functionals suggest that a diamond-like Si(70) isomer is the most stable structure, in contrast to endohedral fullerenes of Si(70). On the other hand, an endohedral fullerene of Si(16)@Si(54) was found to be slightly lower in energy than the diamond-like Si(70) if the Predew-Burke-Ernzerhof functional is used. Our calculation results suggest that around n = 70, the endohedral fullerene and diamond-like isomer are expected to be competitive. The calculated IR vibration spectra, ionization potential, and inverse mobilities were also calculated and discussed.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Chemistry research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2011 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We performed first-principles calculations to study the structure and stability of Si(70) cluster.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #12333 #78837 TLS loss in superconducting res... #78797 Local polarization control of o... #78792 Demonstration of subspace-searc...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal • updated 2026-10-22 04:03:33

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.