Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Robust GHZ State Preparation via Majority-Voted Boundary Measurements
arXiv
Authors: Jean-Baptiste Waring, Sébastien Le Beux, Christophe Pere
Year
2026
Paper ID
12095
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
102
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Preparing high-fidelity Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger (GHZ) states on noisy quantum hardware remains challenging due to cumulative gate errors and decoherence. We introduce Group-Majority-Voting (Group-MV), a dynamic-circuit protocol that partitions arbitrary coupling graphs, prepares local GHZ states in parallel, and fuses them via majority-voted mid-circuit measurements. The majority vote over redundant boundary links mitigates measurement errors that would otherwise propagate through classical feedforward. We evaluate Group-MV on simulated Heavy-hex and Grid topologies for 30 through 60 qubits under a realistic noise regime. Group-MV generalizes to arbitrary GHZ sizes on arbitrary coupling topologies, achieving 2.4x higher fidelity than the Line Dynamic method while tracking the unitary baseline within 3%.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Preparing high-fidelity Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger (GHZ) states on noisy quantum hardware remains challenging due to cumulative gate errors and decoherence.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.