Quick Navigation
Topics
Error Mitigation Nisq Performance
Stratified Sampling for Quasi-Probability Decompositions
arXiv
Authors: Joshua W. Dai, Bálint Koczor
Year
2026
Paper ID
117
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
175
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Quasi-probability decompositions (QPDs) have proven essential in many quantum algorithms and protocols - one replaces a "difficult" quantum circuit with an ensemble of "easier" circuit variants whose weighted outcomes reproduce any target observable. This, however, inevitably yields an increased configuration variance beyond Born-rule shot noise. We develop a broad framework for accounting for and reducing this variance and prove that stratified sampling - under ideal proportional allocation - results in an unbiased estimator with a variance that is never worse than naïve sampling (with equality only in degenerate cases). Furthermore, we provide a classical dynamic programme to enable stratification on arbitrary product-form QPDs. Numerical simulations of typical QPDs, such as Probabilistic Error Cancellation (PEC) and Probabilistic Angle Interpolation (PAI), demonstrate constant-factor reductions in overall variance up to $sim 60$--$80\%$ in an oracle model and robust sim 10\% savings in the pessimistic single-shot regime. Our results can be applied immediately to reduce the net sampling cost of practically relevant QPDs that are commonly used in near term and early fault-tolerant algorithms without requiring additional quantum resources.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Error Mitigation & NISQ Performance research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Quasi-probability decompositions (QPDs) have proven essential in many quantum algorithms and protocols - one replaces a "difficult" quantum circuit with an ensemble of "easier"...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.