Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Quantum Simulation
Efficient quantum circuit contraction using tensor decision diagrams
Crossref
Authors: Vicente Lopez-Oliva, Jose M. Badia, Maribel Castillo
Year
2024
Paper ID
11605
Status
Peer-reviewed
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
171
Citations
N/A
Abstract
AbstractSimulating quantum circuits efficiently on classical computers is crucial given the limitations of current noisy intermediate-scale quantum devices. This paper adapts and extends two methods used to contract tensor networks within the fast tensor decision diagram (FTDD) framework. The methods, called iterative pairing and block contraction, exploit the advantages of tensor decision diagrams to reduce both the temporal and spatial cost of quantum circuit simulations. The iterative pairing method minimizes intermediate diagram sizes, while the block contraction algorithm efficiently handles circuits with repetitive structures, such as those found in quantum walks and Grover’s algorithm. Experimental results demonstrate that, in some cases, these methods significantly outperform traditional contraction orders like sequential and cotengra in terms of both memory usage and execution time. Furthermore, simulation tools based on decision diagrams, such as FTDD, show superior performance to matrix-based simulation tools, such as Google tensor networks, enabling the simulation of larger circuits more efficiently. These findings show the potential of decision diagram-based approaches to improve the simulation of quantum circuits on classical platforms.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- AbstractSimulating quantum circuits efficiently on classical computers is crucial given the limitations of current noisy intermediate-scale quantum devices.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.