Quick Navigation
Topics
Open Quantum Systems Decoherence
Quantum Simulation
Solvable Models Of Infrared Gupta-Bleuler Quantum Electrodynamics
arXiv
Authors: Simone Zerella
Year
2010
Paper ID
11430
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
184
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Hamiltonian models based on two different infrared approximations are studied in order to obtain an explicit comparison with the standard analysis of the infrared contributions, occurring in the relativistically covariant perturbative formulation of Quantum Electrodynamics. Moller operators, preserving respectively the Hilbert scalar product, for the Coulomb-gauge models, and an indefinite metric, for the models formulated in Feynman's gauge, are obtained in the presence of an infrared cutoff, after the removal of an adiabatic switching and with the aid of a suitable mass renormalization. In the presence of a dipole approximation, spurious contributions to the infrared factors are shown to necessarily arise in Feynman's gauge, with respect both to the Coulomb-gauge model and to the amplitudes of Quantum Electrodynamics, and the connection of this result with a recent work on the Gupta-Bleuler formulation of non-relativistic models is discussed. It is finally proven that by dropping the dipole approximation and adopting an expansion around a fixed charged particle four-momentum, first introduced and employed in the study of the infrared problem by Bloch and Nordsieck, the infrared diagrammatic is fully reproduced and spurious low-energy effects are avoided.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2010 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Hamiltonian models based on two different infrared approximations are studied in order to obtain an explicit comparison with the standard analysis of the infrared...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.