Quick Navigation
Topics
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Quantum Foundations
Squeezed vacuum reservoir effect for entanglement decay in nonlinear quantum scissors system
arXiv
Authors: A. Kowalewska-Kudłaszyk, W. Leoński
Year
2010
Paper ID
11403
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
113
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We discuss the coupler system of two nonlinear oscillators excited by an external coherent field prepared in a maximally entangled state (Bell-like state). We show that as a result of the coupler interaction of the system with external broadband squeezed vacuum bath, entanglement decay dynamics can be considerably affected. Besides the phenomena of sudden entanglement death and its rebirth, a shortening (or lengthening) of the total disentanglement time τD can be observed, depending on the squeezing parameters. Moreover, on the example of one of the reborn entanglement cases it is shown that by changing the values of these parameters the maximal values of the negativity for the 3 \otimes 2 system discussed can be tailored.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Foundations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2010 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We discuss the coupler system of two nonlinear oscillators excited by an external coherent field prepared in a maximally entangled state (Bell-like state).
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.