Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Simulation
Largest Schmidt eigenvalue of entangled random pure states and conductance distribution in chaotic cavities
arXiv
Authors: Pierpaolo Vivo
Year
2010
Paper ID
11373
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
112
Citations
N/A
Abstract
A strategy to evaluate the distribution of the largest Schmidt eigenvalue for entangled random pure states of bipartite systems is proposed. We point out that the multiple integral defining the sought quantity for a bipartition of sizes N, M is formally identical (upon simple algebraic manipulations) to the one providing the probability density of Landauer conductance in open chaotic cavities supporting N and M electronic channels in the two leads. Known results about the latter can then be straightforwardly employed in the former problem for both systems with broken β = 2 and preserved β = 1 time reversal symmetry. The analytical results, yielding a continuous but not everywhere analytic distribution, are in excellent agreement with numerical simulations.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2010 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- A strategy to evaluate the distribution of the largest Schmidt eigenvalue for entangled random pure states of bipartite systems is proposed.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.