Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Gravity Relativistic Quantum Information Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations Quantum Sensing Metrology Quantum State Preparation Representation

Reply to: Atom gravimeters and the gravitational redshift

arXiv
Authors: Holger Mueller, Achim Peters, Steven Chu

Year

2010

Paper ID

11344

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

92

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We stand by our result [H. Mueller et al., Nature 463, 926-929 (2010)]. The comment [P. Wolf et al., Nature 467, E1 (2010)] revisits an interesting issue that has been known for decades, the relationship between test of the universality of free fall and redshift experiments. However, it arrives at its conclusions by applying the laws of physics that are questioned by redshift experiments; this precludes the existence of measurable signals. Since this issue applies to all classical redshift tests as well as atom interferometry redshift tests, these experiments are equivalent in all aspects in question.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Gravity & Relativistic Quantum Information research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2010 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We stand by our result [H.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #11344 #69032 Beyond the Canonical Protocol: ... #69027 Computational Superiority of No... #69013 Quantum correlations and cohere... #68993 Tomography of quantum states wi...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.